We are usually not given over to dramatics particularly in
the choice of a jot title but “hidden dangers” aptly describes the current
situation with phthalates.
What are phthalates?
Phthalates (pronounced “thal-ates”) are esters of phthalic
acid (or benzene-1,2-dicarboxylic acid, to the chemically inclined). They
include di-ethyl phthalate (DEP), di-isobutyl phthalate (DIBP), di-n-butyl
phthalate (DBP), and di-n-octyl phthalate (DOP), to name a few.
Commonly used as plasticizers to make plastics more flexible
and easier to process, phthalates occur in a wide range of products such as
vinyl shower curtains, upholstery, plastic toys, paints, adhesives, and yes,
cosmetics too. (BTW, that new car smell that some of us find so pleasant -
that’s probably phthalates at work.) In the realm of cosmetics and personal
care, phthalates are used in nail polish to render it chip resistant, and in
hairsprays to create pliable coatings so your beautifully styled hair won’t
feel crunchy. The presence of phthalates in these products should be indicated
on the ingredients list on the label. They could be hidden, however, if they
are used in fragrances as solvents or fixatives. Manufacturers are not required
to disclose the ingredients of fragrances because of their proprietary nature;
hence, the consumer would only see “fragrance” on the ingredients list. (To be
fair to the cosmetics industry, phthalates are also “hidden” in a host of other
products that do not require an ingredients label, such as shower curtains,
intravenous bags, and plastic bottles.)
So what’s the danger?
Because of their ubiquitous nature, we are constantly
exposed to and consequently harboring phthalates in our bodies. A study by
the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in 2000 found metabolites associated
with phthalate exposure in every single of the 289 people tested, with the
highest levels recorded in women of reproductive age [1].
This finding is particularly worrisome, as phthalates have
been shown to be reproductive and developmental toxins [2]-[5] and may
contribute to what is known as “testicular dysgenesis syndrome”: increasing
incidence of birth defects of the male reproductive tract such as undescended testis,
and lower sperm count [6]. (Phthalates are believed to inhibit testosterone
synthesis during the critical period of fetal development when masculine traits
are beginning to form.) While a lot of attention has been focused on the "demasculation" of boys by phthalates, women are not immune to their effects. Phthalates are implicated in premature puberty in girls [7], and in
animal studies, they appear to suppress estradiol production, prolong estrous
cycles, and cause anovulation (no egg released in the cycle), a common cause of
infertility [8]. Furthermore recent studies suggest that
prenatal phthalate exposure may be linked to lower birth weight in newborns [9]
and disruptive behavior in offspring [10].
What’s being done?
The use of a number of phthalates in cosmetics has been
banned in the EU, Japan, Taiwan, and other countries. No such restrictions
exist yet in the U.S. where the FDA has not taken regulatory action, citing insufficient evidence of causality. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR; a trade panel that
reviews cosmetics ingredient safety) has asserted that phthalates are safe as
used in cosmetics, the argument being that they are used in much smaller
quantities than doses shown to cause adverse effects (yes, but there are risks
of bioaccumulation from repeated exposure). Phthalate chemical producers cite
the decades long history of use as evidence for their safety and say any
alternative would be less tested and less safe. Their stance is not surprising;
however to maintain the status quo in light of mounting evidence that phthalates are not benign would be a huge disservice to us and our children .
Changes are coming, albeit slowly. Congress has banned
the use of three types of phthalates (DBP, DEHP, and BBP) in children’s toys
effective March 2010. Pressure from environmental and consumer advocacy groups
has caused several cosmetics companies (OPI, Orly, Sally Hansen) to reformulate
their nail polishes without phthalates. The EPA announced in its
Chemical Action Plan in December 2009 that it will evaluate the risks of 8 phthalates “because
of their toxicity and the evidence of pervasive human and environmental
exposure to these chemicals.” [11] EPA intends to add them in autumn 2010 to the Concern List under
the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act “as chemicals that present
or may present an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment.”
What we are doing
We talked about parabens in
an earlier jot, and if we were to
compare these two suspected endocrine disruptors, we would put phthalates as higher risk (rest assured they are both excluded from our products). We are
mindful that they may be hidden in fragrances; hence we use only phthalate-free
fragrances in our bath and home scent lines. Products that are expected to
linger on the skin, e.g. lotions, lip balms, and deodorants, are scented with
natural essential oils, absolutes, and oleoresins. These are all natural fragrances
that we invest a considerable amount of effort and expense into procuring and
using. We are also in the process of reducing (and eventually eliminating) the use of shrink wrap in our
products. You may find changes in the packaging of some of
our products in the weeks ahead as we remove shrink wrapping and add tamper-evident paper seals. While the shrink wrap does not contact the
products directly (and should not transfer to you), we feel we should not potentially add to the phthalate load
in the environment.
At home, we have switched to fabric shower curtain
liners and are happy to realize that they can be laundered and reused. We also avoid storing and heating food in plastic containers, and our cars, because of their age, no longer have the new car smell.
References:
1. Blount et al. Levels of Seven Urinary Phthalate Metabolites in a Human Reference
Population. Environmental Health Perspectives. 108 979-982 (2000)
2. Park et al. The plasticizer diethylhexyl phthalate
induces malformations by decreasing fetal testosterone synthesis during sexual
differentiation in the male rat. Toxicological Sciences. 58 339-349 (2000)
3. Barlow et al. Male reproductive tract lesions at 6, 12, and 18 months of age
following in utero exposure to di(n-butyl) phthalate. Toxicologic Pathology. 32 79-90
(2004)
4. Gray et al. Perinatal exposure to the phthalates DEHP, BBP,
and DINP, but not DEP, DMP, or DOTP, alters sexual differentiation of the male
rat. Toxicological Sciences.
58 350-365 (2000)
5. Swan et al. Decrease in anogenital distance among male
infants with prenatal phthalate exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives. 113 1056-1061 (2005)
6. Skakkebæk et al. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an
increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects. Human
Reproduction. 16 (972-978)
2001
7. Chou et al. Phthalate exposure in girls during early
puberty. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism. 22 69-77 (2009)
8. Lovekamp-Swan et al. Mechanisms of phthalate ester toxicity in the female
reproductive system. Environmental Health Perspectives. 111 139-145 (2003)
9. Zhang et al. Phthalate levels and low birth weight: A nested
case-control study of Chinese newborns. The Journal of Pediatrics. 155 500-504 (2009)
10. Engel et al. Prenatal
phthalate exposure is associated with childhood behavior and executive
functioning. Environmental Health Perspectives. In Press (2010)
11. http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/phthalates.html
Posted by THY and PP
Comments